Post by account_disabled on Mar 14, 2024 3:04:14 GMT -6
The purpose of creatingof reasonableness and proportionality in the application of isolated fines, in order to rule out the application of anti-isonomic and confiscatory penalties andthe Superior Court of Justice: "In order for the purpose of creating the Superior Court of Justice to be achieved, the constituent legislator transferred to the new court a good part of the jurisdiction previously conferred on the Federal Supreme Court. This is what can be inferred from the comparison of article 105, item I, paragraphs item II, itemsand item III, items 'a', 'b' and 'c' of the current Constitution, with article , item I, items and 'f', item II, items, and item III, itemsCharter, as amended by amendment no.
From the extinct Federal Court of Appeals, the Superior Court of Justice inherited a small part of the jurisdiction. This is revealed by the comparison of article 105, item I, paragraphsof the Federal Constitution of with article item I, paragraphs of the Charter, with the wording given by Amendment . It does not seem correct to say that the Superior Court of Justice replaced the Federal Court of Appeals. In fact, everything EX Mobile Phone Numbers indicates that the extinct court gave way to the current federal regional courts. This is the conclusion drawn from the comparison of article of reasonableness and proportionality in the application of isolated fines, in order to rule out the application of anti-isonomic and confiscatory penalties.
The current Constitution, with article , item I, subparagraphsand 'e', and section III, of the 1967 Charter, as amended by amendment Professor José Afonso da Silva summarized the competence of the Superior Court of Justice as follows: "What gives the STJ its own characteristic are its attributions of controlling the positive completeness, authority and uniformity of interpretation of federal law, embodying jurisdiction to protect the principle of the safety of objective Law, which constitutes a legal value — which summarizes certainty, guarantee and order — a value that imposes the need for a top body and a procedural institute for its real implementation at the procedural level.
From the extinct Federal Court of Appeals, the Superior Court of Justice inherited a small part of the jurisdiction. This is revealed by the comparison of article 105, item I, paragraphsof the Federal Constitution of with article item I, paragraphs of the Charter, with the wording given by Amendment . It does not seem correct to say that the Superior Court of Justice replaced the Federal Court of Appeals. In fact, everything EX Mobile Phone Numbers indicates that the extinct court gave way to the current federal regional courts. This is the conclusion drawn from the comparison of article of reasonableness and proportionality in the application of isolated fines, in order to rule out the application of anti-isonomic and confiscatory penalties.
The current Constitution, with article , item I, subparagraphsand 'e', and section III, of the 1967 Charter, as amended by amendment Professor José Afonso da Silva summarized the competence of the Superior Court of Justice as follows: "What gives the STJ its own characteristic are its attributions of controlling the positive completeness, authority and uniformity of interpretation of federal law, embodying jurisdiction to protect the principle of the safety of objective Law, which constitutes a legal value — which summarizes certainty, guarantee and order — a value that imposes the need for a top body and a procedural institute for its real implementation at the procedural level.
Thank you guest!